Archive for June 2nd, 2011

Truvia Sweetener Review

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

Truvia sweetener  was released for public consumption some two years ago, and I bought a couple boxes of it, eager to try it out.  Well I have tried out several boxes worth, and here’s what I found.

Benefits Of Truvia Sweetener

  • Truvia has a strong yet pleasant aroma that reminds me of butterscotch crumpets or certain brands of vanilla ice cream.  I can smell it with my nose as far as six inches away from the box.
  • Truvia sweetener has the same granular consistency as sugar, and the packets have a bit of weight to them. So it feels and sounds like sugar when shaken.  Truvia’s granules are a bit thicker than typical sugar though, and it is heavier per packet than comparable packets of Equal, Sweet N Low, Stevia, and Splenda.
  • Truvia sweetener is white in color, just like sugar, and it has a rough feel to it that’s cool to the touch, again, just like sugar.
  • Truvia sweetener dissolved quickly in my tea, and I do like the flavor.
  • To me, Truvia sweetener tastes no different than the Now Stevia I’ve been using for nearly thirteen years.
  • Truvia sweetener contains Rebiana, which comes from the leaves of the stevia plant.  A big fan of stevia, I’m glad to see that stevia may well be making it into the mainstream market as the primary sweetener in Truvia.
  • Truvia sweetener does not appear to create craving for more of it.  Nice.  So in me anyhow, Truvia is non addictive, which differs markedly from sugar or Splenda.

What I Dislike About Truvia Sweetener

  • To get the level of sweetness to which I’m accustomed, I had to use 5 packets of Truvia sweetener in my big cups of Bigelow Plantation Mint tea.
  • This means that I get 16 cups of sweetened tea per 80-packet box of Truvia.  At $5.78 per box when I last bought Truvia, my sweetener cost per cup of tea is $0.36.  This seems rather costly, doesn’t it.  Hopefully, the price will come down over time as often happens when the new becomes the usual.  The box says that each packet sweetens like two teaspoons of sugar.
  • The box says that Truvia is suitable for use by diabetics, because it has zero calories per serving.  Its primary ingredient is   Erythritol,   a   sugar alcohol.  I wondered why my stomach became a bit unsettled after consuming several cups of tea with Truvia in them.  This is not hard to manage however.  As per usual, everything in moderation.
  • Given the   sugar alcohol   content, Truvia sweetener might cause diarrhea in some folks; especially if they indulge in it as extremely as I did.  It did not bother me that way once I got used to Truvia and learned how much I can consume in a day without problems.

So I would recommend Truvia sweetener if you’re not put off by the price or sickened by   sugar alcohols.   Look for lime-green and white box with a strawberry on it that has the word   truvia   in all lower case letters.  Its slogan is, “Nature’s Calorie-Free Sweetener.”

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Other Sweetener Reviews

References

Mrs. Paul’s Crunchy Fish Fillets Review

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

I’ve eaten the various incantations of these Mrs. Paul’s Crunchy Fish Fillets for the past thirty years.  Here are my thoughts on this delicious supper-time delicacy:

Benefits Of Mrs. Paul’s Crunchy Fish Fillets

  • These breaded, crunchy fish fillets from Mrs. Paul’s have a pleasant, not-too-fishy flavor.
  • Their box can be re closed with built-in tabs that fit into slots on the top flap.
  • The crunchy fish fillets themselves are packed in a re close-able plastic bag for freshness.
  • These Mrs. Paul’s fillets are 100% Alaska Pollock fish, and no fillers.  Alaska Pollock is a meek-tasting yet full-bodied fish (at least, as full-bodied as whitefish can be anyhow).  So it accepts flavoring spices well without dominating the dish.
  • This breaded fish has lots of good-for-the-heart omega-3 fatty acids.
  • These Mrs. Paul’s breaded fish fillets absorb lots of Frank’s hot sauce; my favorite topping to drench over them.
  • I follow the twenty-eight to thirty minutes in the oven at 425 degrees instructions on the box.  This always yields very hot, quite crunchy, and golden brown fish fillets.
  • While baking, the fish fillets give off a mouth-watering aroma, so that when they’re finally ready to eat, I’m really anxious to devour them.   This aromatic preamble makes actually eating them even more of a delectable treat.

What I Dislike About Mrs. Paul’s Crunchy Fish Fillets

  • Each serving (two small fillets) has 250 calories.  Yet I must eat three or four servings to really feel full and fulfilled.  The breading no doubt add lots of extra calories.
  • Mrs. Paul’s makes the breading from enriched flour.  I’d prefer that they use all whole grains in their seasoned coatings.The flour they apply appears to be bleached, though it does not say bleached on the box.
  • These Mrs. Paul’s fillets are a bit high on the saturated fat content (5 grams per serving). I’d rather eat things with no saturated fat.  But that’s probably more than offset by the omega-3s also contained within.
  • They also have added sugar and preservatives.  So these fish fillets definitely qualify as one of those “dreaded” processed dishes.
  • There’s no indication on the box that these Mrs. Paul’s fish fillets have been tested for mercury.  That would be reassuring, given the concern these days over heavy metals in the food supply.  But I’ve eaten these for so long now without discernible ill effects, that I’m not really worried about mercury in my fish.
  • These frozen fish fillets do not heat up well in the microwave.  In fact, the box does not recommend microwave preparation.  But an ability to “nuke” them would shorten preparation time significantly.

Though they could be better if prepared without the white flour and sugar, they’re good eating nonetheless so long as you don’t gorge on them too often.  Over all, I truly love the flavor of Mrs. Paul’s Breaded Fish Fillets.  They cost little, are pretty easy to prepare, taste delicious, and are on the whole quite good for you.  So I’d highly recommend them to anyone who is hungry for the taste of good fish.  If you’re a fish lover as I am, you be quite pleased with the meals in which you serve these Mrs. Paul’s Breaded Fish Fillets.

Tom Hesley

Other Mrs. Paul’s Fish Product Reviews

Gorton’s Garlic and Herb Crunchy Breaded Fish Fillets Review

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

I tried these Gorton’s Garlic and Herb Crunchy Breaded Fish Fillets.  Here are my thoughts,

Benefits Of Gorton’s Garlic and Herb Crunchy Breaded Fish Fillets

  • These breaded fish fillets definitely had a pleasant yet mild garlic flavor, that was not strong enough to give me garlic breath (that I know of).
  • The box says that these fillets have been tested for mercury and contain none.  That’s reassuring, as I like to eat these at least a couple times throughout the month.
  • These Gorton’s fillets have no fillers, and the 100% fish they used is Alaska Pollock.  This is a mild-tasting fish that accepts flavoring spices well.
  • They have lots of omega-3 fatty acids that are great for the heart.
  • These Gorton’s breaded fish fillets absorb lots of hot sauce; my favorite condiment for them.
  • They emit a mouth-watering aroma while baking, so that by the time they’re ready to eat, I’m really chomping at the bit to devour them.   This makes actually eating these fish fillets all that much more pleasing.

What I Dislike About Gorton’s Garlic and Herb Crunchy Breaded Fish Fillets

  • Each serving (two small fillets) has 260 calories.  Yet I must eat three or four servings to really feel full and fulfilled.  The breading seems to add lots of extra calories.
  • I follow the twenty minutes in the oven at 425 degrees instructions on the box.  But this does not produce very crunch fish fillets.  In fact, the ones I had last night were rather soggy.  But a few minutes longer in the oven dries them up a bit more.
  • Gorton makes the breading from bleached, enriched flour.  I’d prefer that they use all whole grains in their seasoned coatings.
  • These Gorton’s fillets are a bit high on the saturated fat content (4 grams per serving). I prefer eating things with virtually no saturated fat.  But that’s probably more than offset by the omega-3s also contained within.
  • They also have added sugar and preservatives.  So these fillets definitely qualify as one of those “dreaded” processed foods.
  • Nor do these fillets come in a resealable plastic bag to prevent freezer burn and strange tastes from entering them.  I’ve seen other Gorton’s products that do ship in resealable plastic bags.  But as of this writing, our local Walmart store only carries the boxed version of this product.

Over all though, I really enjoyed eating Gorton’s Garlic and Herb Crunchy Breaded Fish Fillets.  They’re inexpensive, taste great, and are on the whole good for you.  Though they could be better if made without the sugar and white flour, they’re good eating nonetheless so long as you don’t eat too much of them too often.  So check them out.  If you’re a fish fan as am I, you won’t be sorry.

Tom Hesley

Other Gorton’s Product Reviews

Related Posts

Koss Tech 2, Tech2, Tech/2 Headphones Review

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

I owned the  Koss Tech 2 (Tech2, Tech/2) headphones  for twelve years throughout the late seventies, eighties, and early nineties,  I played them over many evenings with several CD players, mixing boards, portable radios, and stereo receivers.  Allow me to   review the   Koss Tech/2  headphones here because as they were my first pair of   real   stereo headphones, and since they represented such a big step up from any headphones I’d ever heard before 1979, I thought them exceptional audio listening devices, and thus, still worth discussing even though it’s been over twenty years since I’ve experienced them routinely.

I bought the Koss Tech 2 headphones from a roommate in 1979, used, for $30, who had purchased them at a flea market perhaps a year earlier.  So I do not know how old these headphones were at the time.  But for me, they held up very well, until the back plates on each driver came unglued.  I considered repairing them.  But by1991, I had developed a hankering for a new and better pair of headphones.  So I replaced my Koss Tech 2s with the Sony MDR-V500 studio monitor headphones, well-satisfied and convinced that I’d indeed gotten my $30 worth from the Koss Tech2s.

In retrospect, the Tech2 studio headphones were strong on the midrange frequencies, a bit weaker on the high end, and had noticeably lacking bass response.  I used an equalizer with them always, to flatten out their sound.  But once this was done, they sounded terrific.

Actually, the reduced bass output made these phones good for portable CD player listening, since these players in the eighties tended to be strong on the bass anyhow.  I’ve used the Koss Tech 2 headphones on lots of train trips, though they weren’t terribly comfortable.  Their good sound however, compensated for their rather hard ear cushions.  I’ve owned many headphones from Sony, Koss, Grado, and Apple over the past three plus decades.  The Koss Tech 2 units rank about mid way up in terms of over all performance in my view.  While when I owned them, I thought them my all-time favorite stereo headphones, I’ve since discovered numerous models from the other manufactures listed above that beat out the Koss Tech2s by far.

Given how little the Tech-2s cost me, I found only a tiny amount to gripe about.  My biggest complaint is that the ear cushions were not soft at all and would hurt my ears after listing to several plays of Pink Floyd’s The Wall album.  I never bothered replacing the ear cushions and I’m not even sure that replacements would even be available today.

But if you enjoy listening to vintage stereo headphones with lots of midrange and high power-handling capability, then I’d highly suggest the Koss Tech/2 headphones if you can find them.  You get an enduring, hard-wearing pair of quality audio head gear, that works reasonably well in the studio, in transit, and just about any casual listening environment you’d want to establish.

What I Liked About The Koss Tech-2 Headphones

  • The Tech/2 headphones reduced surrounding noise adequately for somewhat quiet environments, which is a useful feature of their closed-air design. A metal back plate covered the rear of the driver speaker in each earpiece, and this kept sound both in and out fairly well.
  • Thus, the Koss Tech 2 headphones were a good choice to listen to when other people were near and wished not to be disturbed by my Pink Floyd.
  • The Tech-2s offered a wide range of headband adjustment and came equipped with a microphone mounting screw; though I never purchased a producer mic for them.
  • The Tech2 headphones looked as good as they sound; perhaps even better.  They were a walnut dark brown color with a silver Tech2 logo on the back plates of each ear driver speaker.  This gave them a sleek, hi-tech appearance, that matched fairly well the finish on my Pioneer SX-1000TW stereo receiver.
  • The Koss Tech 2 headphones could play loud enough, with the wide dynamic range over mostly the midrange part of the audio frequency band.  This suits them particularly for widely-varying musical volume levels, such as those encountered in classical music and in   Another Brick In The Wall.
  • While the connecting audio cable could not be unplugged from the unit, replacement would have been easy with a screwdriver, cutters, glue, and a soldering iron.
  • A portable CD player drove the Koss Tech/2 headphones sufficiently.
  • The Koss Tech2 headphones, perhaps owing to their rugged and quite heavy design, seemed quite forgiving of abuse.  I often dropped these earphones on tables or floors at the conclusion of my listening sessions, with no ensuing problems.  They were not easily broken thus, and held up well in rough listening locations such as studios, DJ gigs, and travel settings.
  • The Koss Tech 2 headphones came with a Y configured audio cable, which meant that both sides left and right, had a cable attached.  This enhanced their overall balance on my head, which was actually quite good, even if it did increase susceptibility of their coiled cord to tangling.

What I Disliked About The Koss Tech-2 Headphones

As I mentioned earlier, given how cheaply priced these headphones were, I found none too much to lawfully complain about in them.  But here are several gripes I managed to scratch out after considerable head scratching:

  • The Tech/2 headphones were quite heavy.
  • Listening with them through long periods would actually bend my eyeglasses and make it hard for me to see.  Thus, when finished listening to Ooooh, I Need A Dirty Woman perhaps ten times, I’d have to refashion the temple pieces on my glasses back into the correct shape for good vision.  Eventually, I got into the habit taking off my eyeglasses when planning to use my Koss Tech 2s.
  • The headband on the Koss Tech/2 headphones did not include any spongy padding, though this did not appear to make them much less comfortable.  But I wore them so much at twenty years of age, that the constant pressing of the headband on the top of my head began thinning my hair right where the band pressed.
  • Over all, the Koss Tech-2 headphones lacked comfort.  I could only listen for an hour or so before my temples would hurt.
  • These phones were not equipped with gold connectors; which provide the most reliable connection to the audio source.  But I never had problems with corrosion or other forces to which a gold connector is immune, in the silver connectors found on the Tech2s.
  • The cables were not as easy to replace as they would have been if made detachable.
  • The Koss Tech2 ear cushions were liquid-filled for comfort, but not terribly comfy.
  • As mentioned, the Koss Tech 2 headphones heavily favor the mid-range frequencies, and this used make my ears ring after prolonged listening to Mother Do You Think They’ll Drop The Bomb, especially before I started using an equalizer.
  • The Tech/2 headphones can only be worn one way for comfort.  That is: The left earphone must be positioned on the left ear, and the right earphone must be positioned on the right ear.  I found that the cushions did not fit wellon top of my ears if worn the other way.
  • So with these headphones, I had to make sure that my turntable, tape deck, and other stereo device connectors were not reversed, because reversing the headphones on my head was not a workable option with the Koss Tech 2s.
  • My ears did not fit inside the ear cushions of the Koss Tech2 headphones at all.  Thus, these phones seemed to incorporate an over-the-ear as opposed to an around-the-ear design, much like the Grado RS-1 headphones.  This further decreased Tech/2 comfort, as the cushions were not soft enough for this type of design to be comfortable for long.  The cushions were simply too inflexible and flat.
  • Wearing the Tech/2 headphones made my ears sweat profusely.
  • The ear pads were medium sized in circumference, but very shallow.  Thus, the front of the driver speaker touched my ear.

In sum: I thought the   Koss Tech/2 headphones   a fair purchase for the money as well as a good match to my novice listening requirements as a young adult. While today I would not describe the Koss Tech 2 headphones as extremely great, they were okay nonetheless as starter headphones.  I just wish they had been lighter, softer, and had sounded better, but when I owned them, I really didn’t care about that because I had no idea that anything better was out there.  But today, given what I know now about the more modern and much better-sounding headphones from Sony and Sennheiser especially, I would probably not buy the Koss Tech/2s again.  I’ve grown beyond them.  But I’d recommend them as a good first course pair of quality headphones for anyone just starting out in high fidelity audio listening.

I’ll add any new information I discover to this post as it comes in, about these earphones.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts